Comment Now on Interior Proposal to Shift Oil and Gas Cleanup Burdens to Montanans

A new proposed rule from the U.S. Department of the Interior would shortchange Montanans, reduce public input on decisions affecting public lands and waters, and put more fish and wildlife habitat at risk.

The proposal would roll back key parts of the Bureau of Land Management’s 2024 Oil and Gas Rule, including up-front bonding requirements that help to ensure oil and gas companies — not taxpayers — pay to clean up and restore public lands after drilling. The current rates recognize the true costs of plugging wells and reclaiming damaged public lands, but weakening those requirements increases the likelihood that abandoned and orphaned wells will be left for Montanans to clean up – and pay for.

Under the proposed rule, public comment periods for oil and gas leasing decisions would be reduced from 90 days to just 10 days, leaving hunters, anglers, landowners and local communities with little time to understand proposals and provide adequate public input. 

Existing safeguards that ensure critical habitat, clean water, and other public uses are all considered would also be weakened with the proposed rules.

Montanans support responsible energy development, but only when developers are held accountable, taxpayers receive a fair return, and local communities have meaningful opportunities to weigh in on decisions affecting public lands and waters. These new proposed rules grant us none of these.

The Montana Wildlife Federation encourages comments in opposition to the proposed rollback. The deadline to comment is August 24th. 

COMMENT HERE

Suggested talking points: 

  • As a Montanan, I insist that my voice be heard and weighed appropriately in how our public lands are used. 10 days of public comment are insufficient. The two 30-day public comment periods should remain.
  • This is another example of privatizing profits and socializing the losses—a story all too familiar to Montanans. When companies drill on public lands, they should be held accountable for the messes they make. I ask that DOI maintain the bonding requirements established in the 2024 Leasing Rule. This will ensure that Montana taxpayers are not treated as the cleanup crew for out-of-state corporations.
  • A recent poll found that 95% of Montanans support requiring oil and gas companies, rather than taxpayers, to pay for all cleanup and land restoration costs after drilling is finished. Across the West, nearly 9 in 10 voters support the same basic requirement. We should not be weakening bonding requirements.
  • More than 260,000 Americans commented on the 2024 Oil and Gas Rule, and 99.4% supported the reforms. Just a few years later, we should not be weakening safeguards designed to protect public lands and wildlife habitat. DOI should maintain the leasing preference criteria that attempt to avoid sensitive fish and wildlife habitat and lands with little promise of extractive potential.
  • According to Conservatives for Responsible Stewardship, rolling back federal oil and gas bonding requirements could leave American taxpayers responsible for up to $753.5 billion in cleanup costs on public lands. Rolling back bonding requirements is unfair and fiscally irresponsible.
  • Leases should not be allowed to be held indefinitely. This puts our public lands in limbo, for an uncertain amount of time, with little return to taxpayers, all while risking proactive conservation efforts and restricting other land uses.

COMMENT HERE

Mayday for BLM public lands!

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) manages more than one-third of the nation’s public lands, including more than 8 million acres here in Montana. In recent weeks, actions have been taken to remove native bison — our national mammal — off of BLM public lands, to rollback a rule that would have given conservation a seat at the table in land management decisions, to ease grazing regulations on 155 million acres, reduce royalties paid by oil and gas developers, and to allow the use of sodium cyanide poisoning by government agencies – a practice previously banned because it was indiscriminately killing people’s pets and other wildlife.

Much of this is being done under the guise of supporting ranchers, but what many ranchers really want is for the cost of fuel and fertilizer to go back down, and for this administration to stop promoting imported beef over American-raised protein.

At the same time, Steve Pearce, a former oil executive and noted opponent of public lands, was confirmed by the Senate to be the next Director of the BLM. Both Senators Daines and Sheehy voted to confirm Pearce despite polling showing that 75% of Montanans opposed his nomination

This comes just a few weeks after Montana’s BLM State Director left the agency. We can’t blame her. She is one of many experienced public servants leaving an agency that, because of DOGE-driven cuts, funding reductions, and political upheaval, is losing staff, institutional knowledge, and capacity at a dangerous pace.

Let’s look closer at these recent actions.

Bison

Bison are native, beneficial grazers. In Montana, they are also defined as livestock under state law. The bison at issue are managed like a production herd: they are fenced, tagged, vaccinated, and subject to grazing fees that generate direct economic value from undeveloped public lands.

It should not matter whether those bison are ultimately sold, hunted, donated, or valued as part of Montana’s wildlife and tourism economy. But because these bison belong to the controversial American Prairie (AP), it has mattered a great deal.

Despite American Prairie enrolling 82,000 acres of their lands for hunting in Block Management, leasing the vast majority of their deeded lands to traditional, cattle-grazing producers, and the fact that cattle outnumber bison 8-to-1 on AP’s lands and leases, their organization and their bison continue to be in the crosshairs of our entire Montana delegation and the Governor.

The BLM’s decision to renege on AP’s lease agreements and remove ecologically beneficial grazers from public lands will have unintended consequences that stretch far beyond the prairie. The decision is likely to be appealed, and taxpayers may ultimately bear the cost of defending a politically driven reversal.

Public Lands Rule

Contrary to what this administration would have us believe, our BLM lands do not exist solely for industry’s benefit. On the contrary, the long-standing directive of these lands is for multiple use and sustained yield of our natural resources, for both present and future generations.

In 2024, the Conservation & Landscape Health Rule, more commonly known as the Public Lands Rule, went into effect. Championed by conservationists and supported by 92% of the public comments, the Rule acknowledges conservation as a legitimate use and value of our shared public lands. This is increasingly important as Montana and the West grapple with significant challenges like growing recreational use, invasive species, wildfires, and droughts.

But, as of this month, the new rule is now officially rescinded, and these lands will once again be on an all-you-can-lease buffet for oil and gas, logging, and grazing, with no one else involved, and largely without your say.

Grazing regulations

Many ranchers are excellent land stewards, and grazing has a legitimate place on public lands. But grazing is one use among many, and public lands must also support wildlife habitat, clean water, public access, hunting, angling, and long-term ecosystem health.

But actions taken this month by the BLM all but guarantee grazing permits wherever they’re requested, despite what the public thinks or what the range and conditions can actually sustain. By proposing to remove a requirement for the BLM to “consult, cooperate, and coordinate” with the public when approving and considering changes to grazing permits, the BLM is ushering in a new era of grazing, a free-for-all, where range health and other uses aren’t even considered.

Oil and gas royalties 

May also saw the implementation of a final rule that reduces royalty rates paid by oil and gas corporations benefiting off our public estate. The 25.015% royalty reduction (from 16.67% to 12.5%) will mean an estimated $1.5 billion annual loss in national revenue, according to analysis from Taxpayers for Common Sense. This includes dollars that would have flowed directly to Montana for things like road maintenance and infrastructure, with a quarter of the state’s revenue earmarked for the services benefiting the counties where extraction takes place. This is a big hit to our rural communities, and nothing but a handout to oil and gas to maximize shareholder profits, with no relief to be found for Montanans on our utility bills or at the pump.

Sodium cyanide

Then there’s the poison. At the request of a letter signed by Montana’s Senator Daines, the Trump administration issued an internal memo signaling the end to a prohibition of toxic chemicals from being used to poison wildlife on our BLM public lands.

In an effort to kill coyotes and other small carnivores like foxes and bobcats, government agents will apparently once again be able to use this indiscriminate method of killing on public lands. Wildlife Services, the government agency tasked with managing small carnivores for the benefit of agriculture, has many other animal-control tools at its disposal, including baiting, trapping, sharpshooters with night vision and infrared scopes, and even aerial gunning from helicopters. While these other methods are unsettling, the one advantage over poisoning is that they’re selective and systematic in their management – something poisoning is not.

The BLM, under the direction of the President and Interior Secretary Burgum, has made their priorities and intentions crystal clear: public lands are for unchecked grazing and extractive industries – outdoor advocates, wildlife, hunters and anglers be damned.

You might think this amount of destruction is the result of an entire term, but no, this is just from a few days in May, and to just one subset of our public lands and the agency that manages them. The onslaught of damage inflicted by this administration is deliberately relentless and carefully planned.

So yes: Mayday. Mayday.

Montana’s public lands are in trouble, and our federal delegation appears to be asleep in the cockpit.

Join us in expressing our concerns with our federal delegation.

Contact Senator Daines, Senator Sheehy, and Representative Zinke here.  

Land Board Paves Way For One-Sided Land Exchanges

On Monday, May 18th, the Montana Land Board voted to upend the rules that guide state land exchanges.

Montana Wildlife Federation testified in opposition and requested a 30-day extension, arguing that the process for a complex proposal was deliberately rushed.

Land Exchanges are controversial in nature. They require a willing landowner but must also serve the state’s best interests, often a difficult balance to achieve.

The driving force for this revision, however, was to remove the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation’s (DNRC) ability to flatly deny exchanges that are not in the public interest and/or not eligible under existing land exchange requirements. Now, only the Land Board may deny a proposed exchange. This removes agency authority to defend the public’s interest and places that responsibility solely in the hands of the five-member Land Board.

Additionally, the criteria used to determine whether the public benefits from these exchanges have become more nebulous and are now open to the Land Board’s interpretation and discretion. We are concerned that this will benefit applicants with influential lobbyists and paid consultants, but it might not benefit the public.

As a consolation, there are now more opportunities for public comment, but they only matter if the Governor and the rest of the Land Board listen. We’ve often been told that decisions like these are not a popularity contest. With less clear and quantifiable criteria, it’s now entirely possible to spin any proposal as a fair deal.

Another noted change is the emphasized use of consultants, now allowed to represent both the landowner and the DNRC to speed up approvals, paid for entirely by the landowner/applicant.

Under the new policy, consultants’ scope of work may include “preparing information to support the MEPA analysis,… obtaining surveys, timber cruising, planning and facilitating the public hearing… reviewing and summarizing public comments, etc.” Consultants can even pick the certified appraisers and surveyors they prefer.

This is alarming, and we question what applicants will pay consultants to execute a land exchange unless they’re confident they’re getting the better end of the deal. These consultants are not being hired to be fair, third-party facilitators; they’re being paid to do whatever is necessary to get an exchange approved.

Finally, it’s highly unusual for a Land Board member (Commissioner James Brown in this case) to propose and draft these changes. Typically, any revisions to a policy like this would come directly from DNRC. We are unaware of any problems or issues identified by DNRC that this proposal sought to solve. DNRC did not request this.

If these updates weren’t at the behest of DNRC, who then would benefit from these changes, and why were those interests so adamantly opposed to a 30-day public scoping period?

We believe answers to these questions have (and will) become clear.

You’re invited! Join us May 16 in Lewistown to mark 90 years of conservation

Almost a century ago, on May 16, 1936, hunters and anglers from across Montana gathered at the Placer Hotel in Helena to unite dozens of local rod and gun clubs around a shared mission: protecting wildlife, habitat, and our outdoor way of life. Ninety years later, that same spirit still drives the Montana Wildlife Federation—and your support is part of that legacy.

Ninety years to the day after hunters and anglers first came together to form this Federation, we’ll meet again—this time in Lewistown—to honor our roots, celebrate the conservation legacy we’ve built, and carry that work into the next ninety years.

The Board and staff of Montana Wildlife Federation invite you to join us for our 90th Annual Meeting on Saturday, May 16, 9:00 a.m. at the American Prairie National Discovery Center in Lewistown. We’ll be featuring some of MWF’s 2026 Conservation Award winners, offering door prizes, and providing lunch for registered attendees.

Later, join us for our Storytelling Celebration beginning at 5:00 p.m. at The Depot Room. Drinks, hors d’oeuvres, and inspiring stories from some of Montana’s conservation greats will be shared.

Register free today here!

Help us launch another ninety years of fighting for Montana’s wildlife, habitat, access, and hunting and fishing heritage. Your presence will make a huge difference; we’d love to see you in Lewistown.

  • You’re invited to MWF’s Annual Meeting, 9:00 am Storytelling Celebration 5:00 pm
  • Saturday, May 16 
  • Lewistown, Montana
  • Register free here or email mwf@mtwf.org

 

Blackfoot River at risk!

A foreign-owned mineral company is proposing to commercially mine the headwaters of the Blackfoot in search of gold. This has the potential to devastate the river, the fishery and all the economies and communities downstream. 

The Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is accepting comments until April 13, 2026 on an environmental assessment of the project. However, for a project of this magnitude, with this level of concern, in this location, a simple environmental assessment is wholly insufficient.

Please join the Montana Wildlife Federation in expressing your concerns over this proposed mine and insisting that the DEQ initiate a full environmental impact statement (EIS) to fully analyze the potential impacts and weigh risks before proceeding

Take action now using this customizable letter. Please use your own words or add your own stories or connection to the Blackfoot River to help strengthen your comments.

Click here to customize and generate a letter to Montana DEQ:

https://secure.everyaction.com/g6FHmD5nlk2X23y8ZKFdDw2

Jeff Lukas – MWF Elk Campaign Manager

Jeff Lukas

Conservation Director

Jeff Lukas is a passionate conservationist who has been fishing and hunting his entire life. Whether it’s floating a small stream chasing trout, pursuing elk in the high country, or waiting in a blind for ducks to set their wings, Jeff is always trying to bring more people afield to show them what we are trying to protect. He loves being in the arena, and he will never shy away from conversations about the beautiful and unique corners of Big Sky country.