New UM Poll Shows Montanans Are United on Public Lands, Access and Conservation

A new statewide poll from the University of Montana’s Crown of the Continent and Greater Yellowstone Initiative sends a clear message: Montanans want public lands kept public, access protected, and conservation prioritized.

The 2026 UM Public Lands Poll found strong bipartisan support for public lands and conservation policies, along with rising concern about access, drought, and the effects of staffing and funding cuts on public lands management.

For Montanans, this is not an abstract issue. Public lands are where people hunt, fish, camp, hike, and make a living. They support wildlife habitat, clean water, and the outdoor traditions that define this state.

“Public lands are central to Montana’s identity, and this poll makes clear that support for keeping them accessible, well-managed, and protected runs deep across the political spectrum,” said Frank Szollosi, Montana Wildlife Federation Executive Director.

“Montanans are fed up with cuts that leave our lands, waters, wildlife, and fisheries shortchanged. For hunters, anglers, and everyone who values clean water, healthy habitat, and the freedom to get outside, these findings are a reminder that conservation remains one of the issues that brings Montanans together most strongly.”

Access to Public Lands Is a Growing Concern

One of the clearest findings in the poll is the sharp rise in concern over access.

Today, 71% of Montanans say loss of access to public lands is an extremely or very serious problem. That is a 30-point increase since 2022.

That jump matters. Access is central to Montana’s outdoor heritage and way of life. Public lands only stay public in a meaningful sense if people can actually reach and use them.

The poll also found overwhelming support for keeping those lands in public hands. Eighty-four percent of respondents support banning the sale or transfer of federal public lands, including 65% who strongly support such a ban.

Montanans Are Fed Up With Cuts to Public Lands Management

The poll found widespread concern about recent firings, staffing losses, and funding cuts affecting public lands.

Nearly three in five voters said they are extremely or very concerned about those cuts. When including those who are somewhat concerned, that number climbs above 80%.

A majority of respondents said those cuts would hurt every area tested, with wildfire management topping the list.

That tracks with what many Montanans already understand: well-managed public lands require staff, stewardship, and on-the-ground capacity. Cuts do not stay on paper. They show up in delayed maintenance, reduced habitat work, less oversight, and weaker wildfire response.

Conservation Remains a Top Montana Voting Issue

The poll also shows that conservation remains one of the strongest areas of agreement across party lines.

Nine in 10 Montanans said conservation issues are important when deciding whether to support an elected official, including:

  • 82% of Republicans
  • 92% of independents
  • 99% of Democrats

That kind of alignment is notable. In Montana, public lands, wildlife habitat, clean water, and access are not niche issues. They are core values.

“Since this poll began a dozen years ago, Montanans’ interest in protecting public lands has only grown stronger,” said UM initiative director Rick Graetz. “Bipartisan support for conservation is undeniable and deeply rooted. Wherever I go in Montana, I hear from people wanting to safeguard their quality of life and their freedom to visit public lands and waters. There is no appetite for sell-off or industrialization of public lands here and that clearly shows in the data.”

Montanans Support Strong Public Lands Protections

The survey tested a range of public lands and conservation policies. Support remained broad and consistent across the board.

Key findings include:

  • 84% support banning the sale or transfer of public lands
  • Two-thirds prefer continued Land and Water Conservation Fund funding for conservation over infrastructure uses
  • A plurality support maintaining current Wilderness Study Area protections, with growing support for increasing them
  • Only 7% support eliminating WSA protections altogether
  • 87% support presidential authority to designate national monuments
  • 76% support corner crossing to access public lands
  • About two-thirds oppose rare earth mineral mining in public lands areas
    Similar numbers oppose reducing protections for WSAs

The poll also found that Montanans widely agree on the importance of public input in public lands decisions.

Drought, Snowpack, and Other Pressures Are Top of Mind

Compared to prior surveys, more Montanans say they are worried about low snowpack and drought.

That concern reflects the reality people are seeing on the ground: lower flows, drier conditions, stressed fisheries, and heightened wildfire risk. It also shows that voters are connecting the dots between land management, water, habitat, and long-term conservation.

The poll tested views on data centers as well. More than two-thirds of respondents said they believe data centers would negatively affect water availability, the reliability of the electric grid, and electricity costs.

What This Poll Means

The takeaway is straightforward: Montanans want public lands protected, access maintained, and conservation treated as a real priority.

They want:

  • Public lands kept public
  • Access protected
  • Habitat conserved
  • Agencies properly staffed and funded
  • Public input respected
  • Long-term stewardship prioritized over short-term exploitation

That is a strong mandate for decision-makers in Montana and beyond.

The 2026 UM Public Lands Poll reinforces what sportsmen and women, conservationists, and public lands advocates have been saying for years: these lands matter, and Montanans expect leaders to treat them that way.

Read the full 2026 Voter Survey, summary, and press release here.

Blackfoot River at risk!

A foreign-owned mineral company is proposing to commercially mine the headwaters of the Blackfoot in search of gold. This has the potential to devastate the river, the fishery and all the economies and communities downstream. 

The Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is accepting comments until April 13, 2026 on an environmental assessment of the project. However, for a project of this magnitude, with this level of concern, in this location, a simple environmental assessment is wholly insufficient.

Please join the Montana Wildlife Federation in expressing your concerns over this proposed mine and insisting that the DEQ initiate a full environmental impact statement (EIS) to fully analyze the potential impacts and weigh risks before proceeding

Take action now using this customizable letter. Please use your own words or add your own stories or connection to the Blackfoot River to help strengthen your comments.

Click here to customize and generate a letter to Montana DEQ:

https://secure.everyaction.com/g6FHmD5nlk2X23y8ZKFdDw2

Nominate a Montana conservation champion today

For decades, the Montana Wildlife Federation has recognized the contributions of Montanans who make a difference for wildlife, habitat and public access. As part of our 90th anniversary celebration this year, we are inviting ALL of our members to consider submitting a nomination of people they know who make a difference.

Please review the breadth of awards we’ve given below and use this form to submit a nomination today.

Reach out to MWF Board Director Jim Vashro who is leading the awards committee again this year via his email at jsjvash@montanasky.us or contact MWF Executive Director Frank Szollosi at frank@mtwf.org. We welcome email attachments that provide greater context for the nomination.

Awardees, and everyone, are invited to our Annual Meeting May 16th, 2026, which is taking place in Lewistown this year. We also make arrangements to present awards at time and place convenient for awardees.

As an incentive, anyone who submits a nomination by March 16th will be entered into a raffle for one of two $100 Capital Sports of Helena gift certificates.

Use this form to submit a nomination today!

 

awards

Montana Wildlife Federation Awards

Heritage Award

Special recognition of an individual who has demonstrated an outstanding lifetime of dedication to conserving the wildlife and wild lands and waters of Montana

Conservation Communicator

For outstanding achievement in effectively conveying the natural resource conservation message and creating public awareness of conservation issues in the news media.

Conservation Educator

Individual who has shown outstanding achievement in educating others in natural resource conservation. Education process may be formal or informal of persons at any age level. May be leadership which, by example or demonstration, aids in the natural resource education of others.

Conservation Legislator

The legislator with exceptional achievement and efforts in support of sound natural resource conservation in Montana.

Conservation Organization

The organization which has most effectively promoted natural resource conservation in Montana.

Don Aldrich Conservationist of the Year

The outstanding conservation effort in Montana of an individual for the previous year. Selection will be based on the scope and amount of personal commitment to the conservation of Montana natural resources relevant to the Montana Wildlife Federation.

Fred Carver Sportsman of the Year

The MWF affiliate club member who has contributed most significantly to the promotion of club activities and sportsmen interest.

Les Pengelly Conservation Professional of the Year

This award recognizes wildlife professionals who embody excellence in scientific research, mentorship and community outreach.

MWF Affiliate of the Year

The MWF affiliate club that has contributed most significantly to the promotion of sportsmen’s interests, natural resource conservation and the Mission of MWF.

Outfitter of the Year

Outfitter or outfitting business that provides exemplary services enhancing the public’s ability to equitably enjoy the resources held in common by all people

Special Achievement – Landowner/Sportsmen relations

In special recognition of an individual committed to improved landowner/sportsmen relations.

Special Achievement – Legislative/lobbying

In special recognition of an individual’s outstanding work, dedication and contribution to legislative lobbying efforts that promote the conservation of wildlife, wildlife habitat, and continued public recreational opportunity.

Special Conservation Achievement

Special Conservation Achievement Award

Youth Conservationist

The youth who has demonstrated outstanding ability, leadership, and accomplishments in natural resource conservation. Youth groups working together in a conservation program are also eligible. Limited to youths that have not reached the age of 21 during the contest year.

 

Our Senators Seek To Eliminate Public Land Protections for 100,000 acres

In the final few weeks of 2025, Sen. Daines reintroduced his bill to remove protections from three Wilderness Study Areas in Montana, his fourth such attempt since 2017. Sen. Sheehy immediately joined as a cosponsor, with Rep. Downing also voicing his support. 

In total, these landscapes consisting of the Middle Fork Judith, Hoodoo Mountain, and Wales Creek Wilderness Study Areas account for more than 100,000 acres of wild public lands, places where we hunt, fish, and find solitude.

The effort is misleadingly named the Montana Sportsmen Conservation Act, though it’s not supported by most sportsmen, and does the opposite of conservation. The bill would remove landscape protections that keep these places off-limits to development and motorized use. The threats this effort poses to productive habitat for big game are even greater now combined with the proposed rescission of the Roadless Rule.

While the Montana Wildlife Federation agrees that it’s time to find long-term management solutions for Montana’s Wilderness Study Areas, allowing D.C. politicians to ram through a decision rather than listening to local voices is the wrong way to proceed. Instead, we support and call for local, collaborative conversations and meetings to determine the future of these and other wilderness study areas.

The first three times Sen. Daines tried this, Montanans reminded him how unpopular this is. Today is no different. 

2024 polling by the University of Montana shows that 75 percent of Montanans would actually prefer increasing protections or keeping them the same rather than removing them (just nine percent want them removed). 

More recently, during the 2025 legislative session, a resolution by Sen. Tezak (R – Ennis) to encourage Congress to remove protections from Montana’s wilderness study areas was swiftly defeated by state lawmakers with a bipartisan 9-4 committee vote. 

While this bill has received support from the Montana Outfitters and Guides Association, it’s deeply unpopular with public land hunters across the state who know that these are some of the best security habitats for elk and deer; removing these protections and opening the door for development, roads and more motorized use will only drive more elk off of public lands and onto private ranches. It’s time to remind our federal delegation – again – that we don’t want D.C. bureaucrats making these decisions on how to manage our public lands; Montanans know best.

Take action using this link to send messages asking Senators Daines and Sheehy to withdraw their bill, and to ask Congressmen Zinke and Downing to oppose this effort in the House.

(photo credit: Lisa Ballard)

Public Lands Rule – Comment Now

Our Bureau of Land Management lands are public lands of many uses; the Department of Interior doesn’t think that conservation should be one of them.

To appease oil and gas special interests, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum announced on September 10th that they intend to rescind the Conservation & Landscape Health Rule, more commonly known as the Public Lands Rule.

Championed by conservationists when implemented just last year, the Rule seeks to acknowledge conservation as a legitimate use and value of our shared public lands. This is increasingly important as Montana and the West grapple with significant challenges like growing recreational use, invasive species, wildfires, and droughts.

With this signaled action from the Administration, the Public Lands Rule won’t even be given a chance. Big oil and gas will win again, while hunters, anglers and those who value healthy wildlife habitat and undeveloped wild places will lose.

Why should we care? 

245 million acres of public lands are managed by the BLM, with 8.3 million of those acres in Montana. Right now, these lands are open to public recreational use, but can also be leased by private interests for oil and gas development, grazing, and timber extraction.

The 2024 Public Lands Rule would have added an additional use: conservation. By allowing tribes, states, and/or conservation districts to pay to lease BLM lands – not for the traditional extractive uses, but rather – for conservation, the Public Lands Rule directed the DOI to weigh conservation, recreation, and public access in the same way they consider traditional and extractive uses like grazing, timber, mining, and oil and gas drilling when developing their resource management plans. Additionally, the new rule requires the BLM to consider local input in its decision-making, something we can all support.

With the Public Lands Rule, our federal public lands continue to generate direct revenue while also allowing these lands to recover or remain as they are, thereby supporting the $1.2 trillion outdoor economy that heavily relies on our public lands. It was a win-win.

However, without this rule, these lands will once again be on an all-you-can-lease buffet for oil and gas, logging, and grazing, with no one else involved, and without your say. Millions of acres of public lands – and our outdoor pursuits, small businesses, and gateway communities that rely on them – will suffer.

What can we do about it? 

When the Public Lands Rule was proposed in 2023, a whopping 92% of the public comments favored this new approach. Now, just two years later, we need you to weigh in again to prevent it from being scrapped.

COMMENT NOW

Please join the Montana Wildlife Federation in urging the DOI to reconsider this rescission and to instead leave the Public Lands Rule in place. Let’s give conservation a seat at the table; Montana’s outdoor economy, our rural communities, and our sporting traditions depend on it. 

The 60-day comment period ends November 10, 2025.

Photo credit: Lisa Ballard

Jeff Lukas – MWF Elk Campaign Manager

Jeff Lukas

Conservation Director

Jeff Lukas is a passionate conservationist who has been fishing and hunting his entire life. Whether it’s floating a small stream chasing trout, pursuing elk in the high country, or waiting in a blind for ducks to set their wings, Jeff is always trying to bring more people afield to show them what we are trying to protect. He loves being in the arena, and he will never shy away from conversations about the beautiful and unique corners of Big Sky country.