Mayday for BLM public lands!

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) manages more than one-third of the nation’s public lands, including more than 8 million acres here in Montana. In recent weeks, actions have been taken to remove native bison — our national mammal — off of BLM public lands, to rollback a rule that would have given conservation a seat at the table in land management decisions, to ease grazing regulations on 155 million acres, reduce royalties paid by oil and gas developers, and to allow the use of sodium cyanide poisoning by government agencies – a practice previously banned because it was indiscriminate killing people’s pets and other wildlife.

Much of this is being done under the guise of supporting ranchers, but what many ranchers really want is for the cost of fuel and fertilizer to go back down, and for this administration to stop promoting imported beef over American-raised protein.

At the same time, Steve Pearce, a former oil executive and noted opponent of public lands, was confirmed by the Senate to be the next Director of the BLM. Both Senators Daines and Sheehy voted to confirm Pearce despite polling showing that 75% of Montanans opposed his nomination

This comes just a few weeks after Montana’s BLM State Director left the agency. We can’t blame her. She is one of many experienced public servants leaving an agency that, because of DOGE-driven cuts, funding reductions, and political upheaval, is losing staff, institutional knowledge, and capacity at a dangerous pace.

Let’s look closer at these recent actions.

Bison

Bison are native, beneficial grazers. In Montana, they are also defined as livestock under state law. The bison at issue are managed like a production herd: they are fenced, tagged, vaccinated, and subject to grazing fees that generate direct economic value from undeveloped public lands.

It should not matter whether those bison are ultimately sold, hunted, donated, or valued as part of Montana’s wildlife and tourism economy. But because these bison belong to the controversial American Prairie (AP), it has mattered a great deal.

Despite American Prairie enrolling 82,000 acres of their lands for hunting in Block Management, leasing the vast majority of their deeded lands to traditional, cattle-grazing producers, and the fact that cattle outnumber bison 8-to-1 on AP’s lands and leases, their organization and their bison continue to be in the crosshairs of our entire Montana delegation and the Governor.

The BLM’s decision to renege on AP’s lease agreements and remove ecologically beneficial grazers from public lands will have unintended consequences that stretch far beyond the prairie. The decision is likely to be appealed, and taxpayers may ultimately bear the cost of defending a politically driven reversal.

Public Lands Rule

Contrary to what this administration would have us believe, our BLM lands do not exist solely for industry’s benefit. On the contrary, the long-standing directive of these lands is for multiple use and sustained yield of our natural resources, for both present and future generations.

In 2024, the Conservation & Landscape Health Rule, more commonly known as the Public Lands Rule, went into effect. Championed by conservationists and supported by 92% of the public comments, the Rule acknowledges conservation as a legitimate use and value of our shared public lands. This is increasingly important as Montana and the West grapple with significant challenges like growing recreational use, invasive species, wildfires, and droughts.

But, as of this month, the new rule is now officially rescinded, and these lands will once again be on an all-you-can-lease buffet for oil and gas, logging, and grazing, with no one else involved, and largely without your say.

Grazing regulations

Many ranchers are excellent land stewards, and grazing has a legitimate place on public lands. But grazing is one use among many, and public lands must also support wildlife habitat, clean water, public access, hunting, angling, and long-term ecosystem health.

But actions taken this month by the BLM all but guarantee grazing permits wherever they’re requested, despite what the public thinks or what the range and conditions can actually sustain. By proposing to remove a requirement for the BLM to “consult, cooperate, and coordinate” with the public when approving and considering changes to grazing permits, the BLM is ushering in a new era of grazing, a free-for-all, where range health and other uses aren’t even considered.

Oil and gas royalties 

May also saw the implementation of a final rule that reduces royalty rates paid by oil and gas corporations benefiting off our public estate. The 25.015% royalty reduction (from 16.67% to 12.5%) will mean an estimated $1.5 billion annual loss in national revenue, according to analysis from Taxpayers for Common Sense. This includes dollars that would have flowed directly to Montana for things like road maintenance and infrastructure, with a quarter of the state’s revenue earmarked for the services benefiting the counties where extraction takes place. This is a big hit to our rural communities, and nothing but a handout to oil and gas to maximize shareholder profits, with no relief to be found for Montanans on our utility bills or at the pump.

Sodium cyanide

Then there’s the poison. At the request of a letter signed by Montana’s Senator Daines, the Trump administration issued an internal memo signaling the end to a prohibition of toxic chemicals from being used to poison wildlife on our BLM public lands.

In an effort to kill coyotes and other small carnivores like foxes and bobcats, government agents will apparently once again be able to use this indiscriminate method of killing on public lands. Wildlife Services, the government agency tasked with managing small carnivores for the benefit of agriculture, has many other animal-control tools at its disposal, including baiting, trapping, sharpshooters with night vision and infrared scopes, and even aerial gunning from helicopters. While these other methods are unsettling, the one advantage over poisoning is that they’re selective and systematic in their management – something poisoning is not.

The BLM, under the direction of the President and Interior Secretary Burgum, has made their priorities and intentions crystal clear: public lands are for unchecked grazing and extractive industries – outdoor advocates, wildlife, hunters and anglers be damned.

You might think this amount of destruction is the result of an entire term, but no, this is just from a few days in May, and to just one subset of our public lands and the agency that manages them. The onslaught of damage inflicted by this administration is deliberately relentless and carefully planned.

So yes: Mayday. Mayday.

Montana’s public lands are in trouble, and our federal delegation appears to be asleep in the cockpit.

Join us in expressing our concerns with our federal delegation.

Contact Senator Daines, Senator Sheehy, and Representative Zinke here.  

Land Board Paves Way For One-Sided Land Exchanges

On Monday, May 18th, the Montana Land Board voted to upend the rules that guide state land exchanges.

Montana Wildlife Federation testified in opposition and requested a 30-day extension, arguing that the process for a complex proposal was deliberately rushed.

Land Exchanges are controversial in nature. They require a willing landowner but must also serve the state’s best interests, often a difficult balance to achieve.

The driving force for this revision, however, was to remove the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation’s (DNRC) ability to flatly deny exchanges that are not in the public interest and/or not eligible under existing land exchange requirements. Now, only the Land Board may deny a proposed exchange. This removes agency authority to defend the public’s interest and places that responsibility solely in the hands of the five-member Land Board.

Additionally, the criteria used to determine whether the public benefits from these exchanges have become more nebulous and are now open to the Land Board’s interpretation and discretion. We are concerned that this will benefit applicants with influential lobbyists and paid consultants, but it might not benefit the public.

As a consolation, there are now more opportunities for public comment, but they only matter if the Governor and the rest of the Land Board listen. We’ve often been told that decisions like these are not a popularity contest. With less clear and quantifiable criteria, it’s now entirely possible to spin any proposal as a fair deal.

Another noted change is the emphasized use of consultants, now allowed to represent both the landowner and the DNRC to speed up approvals, paid for entirely by the landowner/applicant.

Under the new policy, consultants’ scope of work may include “preparing information to support the MEPA analysis,… obtaining surveys, timber cruising, planning and facilitating the public hearing… reviewing and summarizing public comments, etc.” Consultants can even pick the certified appraisers and surveyors they prefer.

This is alarming, and we question what applicants will pay consultants to execute a land exchange unless they’re confident they’re getting the better end of the deal. These consultants are not being hired to be fair, third-party facilitators; they’re being paid to do whatever is necessary to get an exchange approved.

Finally, it’s highly unusual for a Land Board member (Commissioner James Brown in this case) to propose and draft these changes. Typically, any revisions to a policy like this would come directly from DNRC. We are unaware of any problems or issues identified by DNRC that this proposal sought to solve. DNRC did not request this.

If these updates weren’t at the behest of DNRC, who then would benefit from these changes, and why were those interests so adamantly opposed to a 30-day public scoping period?

We believe answers to these questions have (and will) become clear.

You’re invited! Join us May 16 in Lewistown to mark 90 years of conservation

Almost a century ago, on May 16, 1936, hunters and anglers from across Montana gathered at the Placer Hotel in Helena to unite dozens of local rod and gun clubs around a shared mission: protecting wildlife, habitat, and our outdoor way of life. Ninety years later, that same spirit still drives the Montana Wildlife Federation—and your support is part of that legacy.

Ninety years to the day after hunters and anglers first came together to form this Federation, we’ll meet again—this time in Lewistown—to honor our roots, celebrate the conservation legacy we’ve built, and carry that work into the next ninety years.

The Board and staff of Montana Wildlife Federation invite you to join us for our 90th Annual Meeting on Saturday, May 16, 9:00 a.m. at the American Prairie National Discovery Center in Lewistown. We’ll be featuring some of MWF’s 2026 Conservation Award winners, offering door prizes, and providing lunch for registered attendees.

Later, join us for our Storytelling Celebration beginning at 5:00 p.m. at The Depot Room. Drinks, hors d’oeuvres, and inspiring stories from some of Montana’s conservation greats will be shared.

Register free today here!

Help us launch another ninety years of fighting for Montana’s wildlife, habitat, access, and hunting and fishing heritage. Your presence will make a huge difference; we’d love to see you in Lewistown.

  • You’re invited to MWF’s Annual Meeting, 9:00 am Storytelling Celebration 5:00 pm
  • Saturday, May 16 
  • Lewistown, Montana
  • Register free here or email mwf@mtwf.org

 

New UM Poll Shows Montanans Are United on Public Lands, Access and Conservation

A new statewide poll from the University of Montana’s Crown of the Continent and Greater Yellowstone Initiative sends a clear message: Montanans want public lands kept public, access protected, and conservation prioritized.

The 2026 UM Public Lands Poll found strong bipartisan support for public lands and conservation policies, along with rising concern about access, drought, and the effects of staffing and funding cuts on public lands management.

For Montanans, this is not an abstract issue. Public lands are where people hunt, fish, camp, hike, and make a living. They support wildlife habitat, clean water, and the outdoor traditions that define this state.

“Public lands are central to Montana’s identity, and this poll makes clear that support for keeping them accessible, well-managed, and protected runs deep across the political spectrum,” said Frank Szollosi, Montana Wildlife Federation Executive Director.

“Montanans are fed up with cuts that leave our lands, waters, wildlife, and fisheries shortchanged. For hunters, anglers, and everyone who values clean water, healthy habitat, and the freedom to get outside, these findings are a reminder that conservation remains one of the issues that brings Montanans together most strongly.”

Access to Public Lands Is a Growing Concern

One of the clearest findings in the poll is the sharp rise in concern over access.

Today, 71% of Montanans say loss of access to public lands is an extremely or very serious problem. That is a 30-point increase since 2022.

That jump matters. Access is central to Montana’s outdoor heritage and way of life. Public lands only stay public in a meaningful sense if people can actually reach and use them.

The poll also found overwhelming support for keeping those lands in public hands. Eighty-four percent of respondents support banning the sale or transfer of federal public lands, including 65% who strongly support such a ban.

Montanans Are Fed Up With Cuts to Public Lands Management

The poll found widespread concern about recent firings, staffing losses, and funding cuts affecting public lands.

Nearly three in five voters said they are extremely or very concerned about those cuts. When including those who are somewhat concerned, that number climbs above 80%.

A majority of respondents said those cuts would hurt every area tested, with wildfire management topping the list.

That tracks with what many Montanans already understand: well-managed public lands require staff, stewardship, and on-the-ground capacity. Cuts do not stay on paper. They show up in delayed maintenance, reduced habitat work, less oversight, and weaker wildfire response.

Conservation Remains a Top Montana Voting Issue

The poll also shows that conservation remains one of the strongest areas of agreement across party lines.

Nine in 10 Montanans said conservation issues are important when deciding whether to support an elected official, including:

  • 82% of Republicans
  • 92% of independents
  • 99% of Democrats

That kind of alignment is notable. In Montana, public lands, wildlife habitat, clean water, and access are not niche issues. They are core values.

“Since this poll began a dozen years ago, Montanans’ interest in protecting public lands has only grown stronger,” said UM initiative director Rick Graetz. “Bipartisan support for conservation is undeniable and deeply rooted. Wherever I go in Montana, I hear from people wanting to safeguard their quality of life and their freedom to visit public lands and waters. There is no appetite for sell-off or industrialization of public lands here and that clearly shows in the data.”

Montanans Support Strong Public Lands Protections

The survey tested a range of public lands and conservation policies. Support remained broad and consistent across the board.

Key findings include:

  • 84% support banning the sale or transfer of public lands
  • Two-thirds prefer continued Land and Water Conservation Fund funding for conservation over infrastructure uses
  • A plurality support maintaining current Wilderness Study Area protections, with growing support for increasing them
  • Only 7% support eliminating WSA protections altogether
  • 87% support presidential authority to designate national monuments
  • 76% support corner crossing to access public lands
  • About two-thirds oppose rare earth mineral mining in public lands areas
    Similar numbers oppose reducing protections for WSAs

The poll also found that Montanans widely agree on the importance of public input in public lands decisions.

Drought, Snowpack, and Other Pressures Are Top of Mind

Compared to prior surveys, more Montanans say they are worried about low snowpack and drought.

That concern reflects the reality people are seeing on the ground: lower flows, drier conditions, stressed fisheries, and heightened wildfire risk. It also shows that voters are connecting the dots between land management, water, habitat, and long-term conservation.

The poll tested views on data centers as well. More than two-thirds of respondents said they believe data centers would negatively affect water availability, the reliability of the electric grid, and electricity costs.

What This Poll Means

The takeaway is straightforward: Montanans want public lands protected, access maintained, and conservation treated as a real priority.

They want:

  • Public lands kept public
  • Access protected
  • Habitat conserved
  • Agencies properly staffed and funded
  • Public input respected
  • Long-term stewardship prioritized over short-term exploitation

That is a strong mandate for decision-makers in Montana and beyond.

The 2026 UM Public Lands Poll reinforces what sportsmen and women, conservationists, and public lands advocates have been saying for years: these lands matter, and Montanans expect leaders to treat them that way.

Read the full 2026 Voter Survey, summary, and press release here.

Blackfoot River at risk!

A foreign-owned mineral company is proposing to commercially mine the headwaters of the Blackfoot in search of gold. This has the potential to devastate the river, the fishery and all the economies and communities downstream. 

The Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is accepting comments until April 13, 2026 on an environmental assessment of the project. However, for a project of this magnitude, with this level of concern, in this location, a simple environmental assessment is wholly insufficient.

Please join the Montana Wildlife Federation in expressing your concerns over this proposed mine and insisting that the DEQ initiate a full environmental impact statement (EIS) to fully analyze the potential impacts and weigh risks before proceeding

Take action now using this customizable letter. Please use your own words or add your own stories or connection to the Blackfoot River to help strengthen your comments.

Click here to customize and generate a letter to Montana DEQ:

https://secure.everyaction.com/g6FHmD5nlk2X23y8ZKFdDw2

Jeff Lukas – MWF Elk Campaign Manager

Jeff Lukas

Conservation Director

Jeff Lukas is a passionate conservationist who has been fishing and hunting his entire life. Whether it’s floating a small stream chasing trout, pursuing elk in the high country, or waiting in a blind for ducks to set their wings, Jeff is always trying to bring more people afield to show them what we are trying to protect. He loves being in the arena, and he will never shy away from conversations about the beautiful and unique corners of Big Sky country.